User talk:AzaToth 

Wikipedia Ads file info – show another – #141
User talk:AzaToth

This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III.

Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived. An archive index is available here.

Contents

Welcome to my talk page. Here are some tips to help you communicate with me:

Thus, if I have left a message on your talk page please DO NOT post a reply here. I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
  • Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
  • Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.


Thankyou

User:Electrical Experiment/Thankyou

Voice of All's history script

I recently asked Voice of All to modify his history script so that it's compatible with the secure server. (diff) He directed me to ask you since he's busy right now. Could you please edit the script to make those changes? It just requires replacing each instance of http://en.wikipedia.org with wgServer and /w/index.php with wgScript. Thanks, Pyrospirit (talk · contribs) 01:07, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Done, hopefully. Let me know if there are any problems. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 17:49, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, it seems to work fine on the secure server now. Pyrospirit (talk · contribs) 22:05, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
good job ioeth :) →AzaToth 22:42, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

User:Fatal!ty

This user is just coming off a 3-hour block for disruptive editing (mass AFD nominations - after speedies and prods on them are declined). He's using Twinkle to make the nominations. Could you keep an eye on things and, if he returns to these edits, revoke his Twinkle rights?- Mgm|(talk) 13:21, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Non-standard holiday infoboxes

I have nominated Category:Non-standard holiday infoboxes (|talk|history|links|watch|logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 10:19, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

"Confusing usernames" in Twinkle

It's me again.

Is there any chance you'll remove the "it's a confusing username" option from Twinkle? The username policy has consistently discouraged blocking "confusing usernames" for over six months now, in addition to the months before that where it was a questionable practice. The introduction of global logins only helped to solidify this, because which names are seen as confusing is highly dependent on the language of the Wikipedia.

The current, stable version of the policy, which has survived a great deal of talk page discussion and some Administrators' Noticeboard threads, says (a) that usernames should only be blocked for confusion in the very rare case that the user keeps editing while ignoring requests to change the name, and (b) even this case is controversial. It definitely doesn't belong on UAA, which is for requesting quick blocks in cut-and-dried cases.

But we still get users who assume that Twinkle matches the policy, and they report usernames for being confusing, which means:

Could you please resolve this by removing the "confusing" option? rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 07:09, 26 November 2008 (UTC)