![]() |
|||||||||||||
|
Second Council of the Lateran |
| Part of a series on the Catholic Ecumenical Councils |
|
| Councils in Antiquity | |
|---|---|
|
Nicaea I • Constantinople I • Ephesus |
|
| Papal Councils during the Middle Ages | |
|
Lateran I • Lateran II |
|
| Councilarism | |
| Modern Councils | |
| General Articles
Ecumenical Councils of the Catholic Church |
|
| Second Council of the Lateran | |
| Date | 1139 |
|---|---|
| Accepted by | Roman Catholicism |
| Previous council | First Council of the Lateran |
| Next council | Third Council of the Lateran |
| Convoked by | Pope Innocent II |
| Presided by | Pope Innocent II |
| Attendance | 1000 |
| Topics of discussion | schism of Antipope Anacletus II |
| Documents and statements | thirty canons, mostly repeating those of the First Lateran Council, clerical marriage declared invalid, clerical dress regulated, attacks on clerics punished by excommunication |
| Chronological list of Ecumenical councils | |
The Second Lateran, and tenth ecumenical council was held by Pope Innocent II in April 1139, and was attended by close to a thousand clerics. Its immediate task was to neutralise the after-effects of the schism, which had arisen after the death of Pope Honorius II in February 1130 and the setting up of Petris Leonis as the antipope Anacletus II.
Contents |
After the death of Honorius II Petrus Leonis, under the name of Anacletus II, was a rival to Innocent II. In 1135, Innocent II held a council at Pisa, which confirmed his authority and condemned Anacletus. Anacletus's death in 1138 helped largely to solve the tension between rival factions. Nevertheless, Innocent decided to call the tenth ecumenical council.1
The Council assembled at the Lateran Palace and nearly a thousand prelates attended. In his opening statement Innocent deposed those who had been ordained and instituted by Anacletus or any of his adherents. King Roger II of Sicilywas excommunicated for maintaining what was thought to be a schismatic attitude. The council also condemned the teachings of the Petrobrusians and the Henricians, the followers of Peter of Bruys and Arnold of Brescia. Finally, the council drew up measures for the amendment of ecclesiastical morals and discipline which the council fathers considered had grown lax. Many of the canons relating to these matters were mostly a restating of the decrees of the Council of Reims and the Council of Clermont.1
The most important results of the council included:
The council also may have banned the use of crossbows against Christians,23 although the authenticity, interpretation and translation of this source is contested.4
Another decision confirmed the right of religious houses of a diocese to participate in the election of the diocese's bishop.5
|
||||||||||||||